Swab Bukal Sebagai Bahan Sexing Piyikan Burung Kenari (Serinus canaria) dan Burung Merpati (Columba livia)

Afif Muhammad Akrom; Soedarmanto Indarjulianto; Yanuartono Yanuartono; Trini Susmiati; Alfarisa Nururrozi; Slamet Raharjo; Rief Ghulam Satria Permana; Yeremia Yobelanno Sitompul

doi:10.22146/jsv.49032

Swab Bukal Sebagai Bahan Sexing Piyikan Burung Kenari (Serinus canaria) dan Burung Merpati (Columba livia)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsv.49032

Afif Muhammad Akrom⁽¹⁾, Soedarmanto Indarjulianto^(2*), Yanuartono Yanuartono⁽³⁾, Trini Susmiati⁽⁴⁾, Alfarisa Nururrozi⁽⁵⁾, Slamet Raharjo⁽⁶⁾, Rief Ghulam Satria Permana⁽⁷⁾, Yeremia Yobelanno Sitompul⁽⁸⁾

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(5) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(6) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(7) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(8) Universitas Nusa Cendana
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Teknik sexing pada burung secara molekuler dengan metode PCR telah banyak dikembangkan, tetapi sampel yang digunakan adalah darah dan bulu yang dianggap invasif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari efisiensi sampel swab bukal sebagai sumber DNA dalam sexing dengan metode PCR. Penelitian ini menggunakan 10 ekor burung kenari (Serinus canaria) yang terdiri dari 6 ekor burung dewasa (3 jantan dan 3 betina) dan 4 ekor kenari piyikan (umur 14 – 18 hari) yang belum diketahui jenis kelaminnya serta 6 ekor merpati (Columba livia) dewasa (3 jantan dan 3 betina) dan 7 ekor merpati piyikan (umur 14 – 25 hari) yang belum diketahui jenis kelaminnya. Amplifikasi fragmen gen dilakukan menggunakan metode PCR dengan pasangan primer CHD1F/CHD1R.Hasil visualisasi produk PCR menunjukkan semua burung jantan dewasa menghasilkan satu band (± 500 bp), sedangkan burung betina dewasa menghasilkan dua band (± 500 bp dan ± 300 bp). Amplifikasi gen dari swab bukal burung kenari muda didapatkan 2 ekor jantan dan 2 ekor betina, sedangkan dari swab bukal burung merpati muda didapatkan 6 ekor jantan dan 1 ekor betina. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa sampel swab bukal terbukti efisien sebagai sumber DNA dalam sexing burung khususnya burung piyikan.

Keywords

sexing; PCR; swab bukal; burung Kenari; burung Merpati

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akrom, A.M., Soedarmanto, I., Yanuartono, Susmiati, T., Nururrozi, A., Raharj0, S. 2019. Sexing Burung Kenari (Serinus Canaria) Secara Genotip Berdasarkan Gen Chromodomain Helicase Dna Binding 1 (Chd1). JBBI. (dalam Review).

Arima, H. and Ohnishi, N. (2006). Usefulness of avian buccal cells for molecular sexing. Ornithol Sci. 5: 139 – 143.

Asawakarn, S., Teeranuwat, I., Watcharaprapapong, N., Siriwatchaiporn, N., Somsai, P., Kuldee, M., Suriyaphol, G., and Dhitavat, S. (2018). Comparison of Dried Blood Spot, Buccal Swab, Cloacal Swab and Feces as DNA Sources toIdentify Avia Sexes by PCR. Thai J Vet Med. 48 (3): 325 – 330.

Birchard, G.F. and Deeming, D.C. (2015). Egg Allometry: Influences of hylogeny and the Altricial-Precocial Continuum. In Nests, Eggs, & Incubation New Ideas About Avian Reproduction. Deeming, D.C. and Reynolds, SJ. (Ed). Oxford University Press. Oxford

Bosnjak, J., Stevanov-Paviovic, M., Vucicevic, M., Stevanovic, J., Simeunovic. P., Resanovic, R., Stanimirovic, Z. (2013). Feasibility of non-invasive molecular method for sexing of parrots. Pakistan J. Zool 45: 715 – 720

Bostwick, K. (2016). Feathers and Plumages. In Handbook of Bird Biology. Lovette, I.J. and Fitzpatrick, J.W. (Ed). 3rd ed. Cornell University, Oxford.

Brown, M.B., and Brown, C.R. (2009). Blood sampling reduces annual survival in Cliff Swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota). The Auk 126:853–861.

Brooks, R., Williamson, J., Hensley, A., Butler, E., Touchton, G., Smith, E. (2003). Buccal Cells as a Source of DNA for Comparative Animal Genomic Analysis. Biotechnol Lett. 25: 451 – 454.

Brubaker, J.L., Karouna-Renier, N.K., Chen, Y., Jenko, K., Sprague, D.T. and Henry, P.F.P. (2011). A Noninvasive, Direct Real-Time PCR Method for Sex Determination in Multiple Avian Spesies. Molecular Ecology Resources. 11: 415 – 417.

Cakmak, E., Peksen, C.A., Bilgin, C.C. (2017). Comparison of Three Different Primer Sets for Sexing Birds. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 29: 59-63

Eiben, K., Fay, R., Jung, A., Rasmussen, A., and Russell, J. (2017). Sex Determination of The Boreal Owl (Aegolius funereus) Using Buccal Swabs and Improved Molecular Techniques. J. Raptor Res. 51 (1): 68 – 71.

Fridolfsson, A. and Ellegren, H. (1999). A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of nonratite birds. J Avian Biol. 30:116–121.

Jepson, P. (2010). Towards and Indonesian Bird Conservation Ethos: Reflections From a Study of Birds-keeping in The Cities of Java and Bali. In Ethno-ornithology: Birds, Indigenous People, Culture and Society. Tidemann, S. and Gosler, A. (Ed). Earthscan, London.

Lee, J.C., Tsai, L., Hwa, P., Chan, C., Huang, A., Chin, S., Wang, L., Lin, J., Linacre, A., Hsies, H. (2010). A Novel Strategy for Avian Spesies and Gender Identification using the CHD Gene. Molecullar and Cellular Probes. 24: 27 – 31.

McDonald, P. and Griffith, S.C. (2011) To Pluck or not Pluck: The Hidden Ethical and Scientific Cost of Relying on Feathers as a Primary Source of DNA. J. Avian Biol. 42: 197 – 203.

Meldgaard, M., Bollen, P.J.A. and Finsen, B. (2004). Non-invasive Method for Sampling and Extraction of Mouse DNA for PCR. Laboratory Animals. 38: 413 – 417.

Morinha, F., Cabral, J.A., Bastos, E. (2012). Molecular sexing of birds: a comparative review of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Theriogenology. 78: 703–714.

Neuhaus, T. Geisen, G, Bolt, H.M, Janzen, V., Kraemer, A., Vetter, H. and Ko, Y. (2004). Reliability of Non-Invasively Acquired Human Genomic DNA as aSubstrate for Real-Time PCR Assisted Analysis of Genetic Polymorphisme. Archives of Toxicology. 78: 390 – 396.

Oberbauer, A.M., Grossman, D.I., Eggleston, M.L., Irion, D.N. Schaffer, A.L., Pedersen, N.C. and Belanger, J.M. (2003). Alternatives to Blood as a Source of DNA for Large-scale Scanning Studies of Canine Genome Linkages. Veterinary Reasearch Communications. 27: 27 – 38.

Price, T. and Birch, G.L. (1996). Repeated Evolution Of Sexual Color Dimorphism in Passerine Birds. The Auk. 113: 842–848.

Seki, S. (2003). Molekular sexing of ndiviual Ryukyu Robin Erithacus komadori using buccal sells as a non-invasive source of DNA. Ornithol. Sci. 2: 135 – 137.

Voss, M., Shutler, D. and Werner, J. (2010) A Hard Look at Blood Sampling of Birds. The Auk. 127 (3): 704 – 708.

Vucicevic, M., Stevanov-Pavlovic, M., Stevanovic, J., Bosnjak, J., Gajic, B., Aleksic, N., Stanimirovic, Z. (2012). Sex Dtermination in 58 Bird Species and Evaluation of CHD Gene as a Universal Molecular Marker in Bird Sexing. Zoo Biology: 1-13

Wellbrock AH, Bauch C, Rozman J, Witte K. (2012) Buccal swabs as a reliable source of DNA for sexing young and adult Common Swift (Apus apus). J Ornithol. 153: 991 – 994.

Winkler, D.W. (2016). Breeding Biology of Birds. In Handbook of Bird Biology. Lovette, I.J. and Fitzpatrick, J.W. (Ed). 3rd ed. Cornell University, Oxford.

Yannic, G., Sermier, R., Aebischer, A., Gavrilo, M.v., Gilg, O., Miljeteig, C., Sabard, B., Strom, H., Pouive, E. and Broquet, T. (2011). Description of Microsatellite Marker and Genotyping Performances using Feathers and Buccal Swabs fo Ivory Gull (Pagophila eburnean). Molecular Ecology Resources. 11: 877 – 889.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsv.49032