Interdependence versus Truth and Justice: Lessons from Reconciliation Processes in Maluku
https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17998
Diah Kusumaningrum
(1*)
(1) Lecturer of Department of International Relation
Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas
Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Truth commissions and trials have been applauded as the way to move on from a violent past. Yet, some post-conflict societies managed to move toward reconciliation without the presence, or the effective presence of such formal institutions. This article discusses a number of lessons learned from Maluku, where reconciliation took the interdependence path. Taking on an interpretive, emic approach, it elaborates on the sites and mechanisms of interpendence. It argues that interdependence can be as viable as truth and justice procedures in bringing about reconciliation.
Keywords
interdependence; reconciliation; Maluku conflict.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17998
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 7679
|
views : 3437
Refbacks
There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik)
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .
<div class="statcounter"><a title="Web Analytics" href="http://statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img class="statcounter" src="//c.statcounter.com/10932543/0/2e122c85/0/" alt="Web Analytics"></a></div> <div class="statcounter"><a title="Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter" href="http://statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img class="statcounter" src="//c.statcounter.com/10932543/0/2e122c85/0/" alt="Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter"></a></div> View My Stats