Pembentukan Struktur Negosiasi Kota Surakarta: Kritik Nalar ‘Best Practices’ dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan
https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.11389
Hendra Try Ardianto
(1*)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper attempts to describe two fundamental ideas about best practices. Firstly, criticism of the notion of "best practices" that is very agent-centric. It asserts that the discourse "best practices" should not be separated from socio political structures. In the case of Surakarta, the agency perspective that put Jokowi as the center of innovation was apparently failed to understand the overall dynamics of governance practices and tend to be misleading. Secondly, this paper tries to restore the meaning of participation as a form of politicization, not merely procedural- managerial affairs. Thus, participation is not only a mobilization to encourage the dreams of innovation, rather, participation is a matter of negotiation in which the contestation of interests between people, nations, and the market becomes the main case.
Keywords
struktur-agen; partisipasi; arena partisipasi; negosiasi; best practices; structure-agen; participation; arena of participation; negotiation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.11389
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1773
|
views : 1410
Refbacks
There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
<div class="statcounter"><a title="Web Analytics" href="http://statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img class="statcounter" src="//c.statcounter.com/10932543/0/2e122c85/0/" alt="Web Analytics"></a></div> <div class="statcounter"><a title="Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter" href="http://statcounter.com/" target="_blank"><img class="statcounter" src="//c.statcounter.com/10932543/0/2e122c85/0/" alt="Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter"></a></div> View My Stats