Otonomi Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara: Dari Ontologi Menuju Pengembangan Metodologi Riset

Sampean Sampean; Raudlatul Jannah

doi:10.22146/jps.v10i1.82278

Otonomi Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara: Dari Ontologi Menuju Pengembangan Metodologi Riset

https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v10i1.82278

Sampean Sampean⁽¹⁾, Raudlatul Jannah^(2*)

(1) Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang kajian Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara yang banyak dipengaruhi oleh pengetahuan Barat, meskipun karakteristik desa di Asia Tenggara berbeda dengan desa di Barat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis ontologi Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara dengan menggunakan metode studi literatur pada tiga artikel yang diterbitkan pada tahun 1959 dan satu artikel tahun 2022. Penggunaan teori Pierre Bourdieu membantu peneliti menjelaskan praktik dominasi Barat terhadap kajian Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa sejarah perkembangan Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara tidak bisa dilepaskan dari orientalisme, kolonialisme, dan fenomena Perang Dunia II. Ilmuwan asing memainkan peran penting dalam memperkenalkan dominasi pengetahuan "ilmiah" Barat. Ontologi Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara diwarnai oleh tipe positivisme logis, tipe naturalistik, dan tipe materialisme. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kajian Sosiologi Pedesaan di Asia Tenggara pada tahun 1959 dirancang untuk melayani kolonialisme dan kepentingan Barat, dan perlu adanya otonomi kajian Sosiologi Pedesaan yang memberikan sudut pandang baru melalui pembaruan metodologi di Indonesia. Data Desa Presisi adalah salah satu bentuk pembaharuan metodologi dalam sistem penelitian di Indonesia yang berupaya membangun otonomi Sosiologi Pedesaan.

Keywords

Sosiologi Pedesaan; Otonomi; Metodologi; Data Desa Presisi

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achterberg, Peter. 2016. “Quantitative Analysis in Cultural Sociology: Why It Should Be Done, How It Can Be Done.” Pp. 225–36 in Sage handbook of cultural sociology. Landon: Sage Publisher.

Baškarada, Saša, and Andy Koronios. 2018. “A Philosophical Discussion of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research in Social Science.” Qualitative Research Journal 18(1).

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Masschusetts: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. Distinction: A Social Critique of The Judgement of Taste. Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. California: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2018. “Social Space and the Genesis of Appropriated Physical Space.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42(1):106–14. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12534.

Bourdieu, Pierre, and L. J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre, Loic J. D. Wacquant, and Samar Farage. 1994. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Contemporary Sociological Theory 12(1):1–18.

Catapusan, Benicto T. 1957. Development of Sociology in Philippines.

Constance, D. H. 2018. “Rural Sociology.” Pp. 62–74 in Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food System. Vol. 5. Elsevier.

Creswell, John W. 2016. Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage publications.

Freedman, Maurice, and M. G. Swift. 1959. “Rural Sociology in Malaya.” Current Sociology 8(1):1–8.

Go, Julian. 2013. “Decolonizing Bourdieu: Colonial and Postcolonial Theory in Pierre Bourdieu’s Early Work.” Sociological Theory 31(1):49–74. doi: 10.1177/0735275113477082.

Greenhill, Jennene, and Kerry Dix. 2008. “Respecting Culture: Research with Rural Aboriginal Community.”

Halfacree, K. H. 1993. Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural. Vol. 9.

Hudson, Pat, and Mina Ishizu. 2017. History of Number: An Introduction to Quantitative Approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Inglis, David, and Christhother Thorpe. 2012. An Invitation to Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jaspan, M. A. 1959. “Rural Sociology in Indonesia.” Current Sociology 8(1):33–38.

Jolasa, Vincensius Y. 2009. Pierre Bourdieu Dan Pemikirannya Tentang Habitus, Doxa Dan Kekerasan Simbolik. Depok.

Kattsof, Louis. 2003. Pengantar Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogyakarta.

Keenan, John, and Karima Kadi-Hanifi. 2021. “Epistemological Moor-Ing. Re-Positioning Foucault, Bourdieu and Derrida Theory to Its Northern African Origins.” Teaching in Higher Education 26(6):855–70. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2019.1688781.

Laberge, Suzanne, and Joanne Kay. 2002. “Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociocultural Theory and Sport Practice.” Pp. 239–66 in Theory, sport and society. London: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Liu, Yang. 2022. “Paradigmatic Compatibility Matters: A Critical Review of Qualitative-Quantitative Debate in Mixed Methods Research.” SAGE Open 12(1). doi: 10.1177/21582440221079922.

Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2007. “On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept.” Cultural Studies 21(2–3):240–70. doi: 10.1080/09502380601162548.

Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2016. “Outline of Ten Theses on Coloniality and Decoloniality.” Berkeley Planning Journal 26(1). doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.5.6700.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2000. Local Historis/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern, and Border Thinking. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, Walter D., and Catherine E. Walsh. 2018. On Coloniality: Concept, Analytics, Praxis. London: Duke university press.

Mohajer, Nicole, Dawn Bessarab, and Jaya Earnest. 2009. “There Should Be More Help out Here! A Qualitative Study of the Needs of Aboriginal Adolescents in Rural Australia.” Rural and Remote Health 9(2). doi: 10.22605/rrh1137.

Newby, Howard. 1980. “Trend Report: Rural Sociology.” Current Sociology 28(1):3–109. doi: 10.1177/001139218002800102.

Newby, Howard. 1982. Rural Sociology in These Times. Vol. 17.

Pal, Agaton P. 1959. “Rural Sociology in Philippines.” Current Sociology 8(1):16–23.

Radhuber, Isabella M., and Sarah A. Radcliffe. 2022. “Contested Sovereignties: Indigenous Disputes over Plurinational Resource Governance.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 251484862110684. doi: 10.1177/25148486211068476.

Sajogyo, and Pujiwati. 1999. Sosiologi Pedesaan: Kumpulan Bacaan . Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press.

Sampean, Sampean. 2017. “Penetrasi Etnik Bugis - Makassar Dalam Gerak Sejarah Pembentukan Identitas Kebangsaan Indonesia.” in Sosiologi Indonesia : Kajian Analisis Sosial Dengan Pendekatan Konsep Teori Tokoh Sosiologi. Surakarta: Braidilog Sociology.

Sampean, Sampean. 2018. “Sosiologi Islam : Refleksi Atas Keberagamaan Umat Islam Di Indonesia Antara Dogma, Ajaran, Dan Realitas.” Journal of Islamic World and Politics 2(2):402–19. doi: 10.18196/jiwp.2223.

Sampean, and Sofyan Sjaf. 2020. “The Reconstruction of Ethnodevelopment in Indonesia: A New Paradigm of Village Development in the Ammatoa Kajang Indigeneous Community, Bulukumba Regency, South Sulawesi.” MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 25(2):159–92. doi: 10.7454/MJS.v25i2.

Samuel, Hanneman. 2010. Geneologi Kekuasaan Ilmu Sosial Indonesia: Dari Kolonialisme Belanda Hingga Modernisme Amerika. Depok: Kepik Ungu.

Shali, Mohammad, Ebrahim Irannejad, and Mina Rahimi. 2021. “Analysis of Spatial Inequalities in Tehran Metropolis.” International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences 1(2):1–11. doi: 10.52547/ijimes.1.2.1.

Sjaf, Sofyan. 2010. Membaca Sosiologi Dan Sosiologi Pedesaan Sebagai Ilmu Pengetahuan. Bogor.

Sjaf, Sofyan. 2014. Politik Etnik: Dinamika Lokal Di Kendari. Jakarta: Pustaka Obor.

Sjaf, Sofyan, La Elson, Lukman Hakim, and I. Made Godya. 2020. Data Desa Presisi. Bogor: IPB Press.

Sjaf, Sofyan, Sampean, Ahmad Aulia Arsyad, La Elson, Afan Ray Mahardika, Lukman Hakim, Sri Anom Amongjati, Rajib Gandi, Zessy Ardinal Barlan, I. Made Godya Aditya, Sayyid Al Bahr Maulana, and Muhammad Rifky Rangkuti. 2022. “Data Desa Presisi: A New Method of Rural Data Collection.” MethodsX 101868. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101868.

Snyder, Hannah. 2019. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

Taylor, Carl C. 1927. “Research in Rural Sociology.” Amarican Journal of Sociology 33(2):211–21.

Weber, Max. 2009. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London & New York: Routledge.

Webster, Jane, and Richard T. Watson. 2002. “Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review.” MIS Quarterly 26(2). doi: 10.1.1.104.6570.

Williams, Ryan Thomas. 2020. “The Paradigm Wars: Is MMR Really a Solution?” American Journal of Trade and Policy 7(3). doi: 10.18034/ajtp.v7i3.507.

Wiranata, Anom. 2020. “Perubahan Sosial Dalam Perspektif Pierre Bourdie.” Universitas Udayana, Kuta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v10i1.82278