Actors Determination Strategy in Registered Social Network Patents in the Framework of Rewards towards Inventors A Case Study: LIPI Registered Patents 2016

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.22371

Aris Yaman(1*)

(1) Indonesian Institute of Sciences
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Patent is one of the lever factors in improving the nation's competitiveness. A reward to an inventor is one way that can be taken to increase the productivity and patent development in Indonesia. The social network analysis on the relationship of co-invention and registered patents can identify inventing actors who deserves the award. Joko Waluyo obtained an actor who is considered central to the co-invention social network relationships of registered patents in LIPI. It is based on the high value of betweeness and closeness to the node Joko Waluyo. In addition, it was found that the prolific inventor does not always mean a central actor in the social network.


Keywords


Social Network Analysis; Co-Invention; Actors Inventor; betweenness; cloeseness

Full Text:

PDF


References

Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. (P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dang-pham, D., Pittayachawan, S., & Bruno, V. (2017). Why employees share information security advice? Exploring the contributing factors and structural patterns of security advice sharing in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.025

Fathin, C. A. (2016). Analysis of Three Actors : Roles of Government , Private Sector , and University toward Startup Growth in Yogyakarta, 20(1).

Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification, 1(1968), 215–239.

Galvan, C. (2016). Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016.

Nadhiroh, I. M., Aidi, M. N., & Sartono, B. (2015). Publikasi Internasional Indonesia Bidang Kimia Scientometrics Studies : Social Network Analysis of Indonesian International Publication on Chemistry. Warta KIML, 13, 75–90.

Nasir, M. (2016). Pendidikan Tinggi : Membangun Indonesia Unggul dan Berdaya Saing.

Prell, C. (2012). Social Network Analysis : History, Theory and Methodology. Siangapore: SAGE.

Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis : a powerful strategy , also for the information, 441–453. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601

Salamati, P., & Soheili, F. (2016). Social network analysis of Iranian researchers in the fi eld of violence. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 19(5), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.008

Schwab, K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report.

Sulistiawati, A., Lubis, D. P., & Mulyani, S. (2014). Analisis Jaringan Sosial Dalam Gabungan, 2(2), 76–82.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis : Methods and Analysis (Vol. I). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Worrell, J., Wasko, M., & Johnston, A. (2013). International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Social network analysis in accounting information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.06.002



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.22371

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2482 | views : 1724

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2016 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.