Actors Determination Strategy in Registered Social Network Patents in the Framework of Rewards towards Inventors A Case Study: LIPI Registered Patents 2016
Aris Yaman(1*)
(1) Indonesian Institute of Sciences
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Patent is one of the lever factors in improving the nation's competitiveness. A reward to an inventor is one way that can be taken to increase the productivity and patent development in Indonesia. The social network analysis on the relationship of co-invention and registered patents can identify inventing actors who deserves the award. Joko Waluyo obtained an actor who is considered central to the co-invention social network relationships of registered patents in LIPI. It is based on the high value of betweeness and closeness to the node Joko Waluyo. In addition, it was found that the prolific inventor does not always mean a central actor in the social network.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. (P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dang-pham, D., Pittayachawan, S., & Bruno, V. (2017). Why employees share information security advice? Exploring the contributing factors and structural patterns of security advice sharing in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.025
Fathin, C. A. (2016). Analysis of Three Actors : Roles of Government , Private Sector , and University toward Startup Growth in Yogyakarta, 20(1).
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification, 1(1968), 215–239.
Galvan, C. (2016). Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016.
Nadhiroh, I. M., Aidi, M. N., & Sartono, B. (2015). Publikasi Internasional Indonesia Bidang Kimia Scientometrics Studies : Social Network Analysis of Indonesian International Publication on Chemistry. Warta KIML, 13, 75–90.
Nasir, M. (2016). Pendidikan Tinggi : Membangun Indonesia Unggul dan Berdaya Saing.
Prell, C. (2012). Social Network Analysis : History, Theory and Methodology. Siangapore: SAGE.
Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis : a powerful strategy , also for the information, 441–453. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
Salamati, P., & Soheili, F. (2016). Social network analysis of Iranian researchers in the fi eld of violence. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 19(5), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.06.008
Schwab, K. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report.
Sulistiawati, A., Lubis, D. P., & Mulyani, S. (2014). Analisis Jaringan Sosial Dalam Gabungan, 2(2), 76–82.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis : Methods and Analysis (Vol. I). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Worrell, J., Wasko, M., & Johnston, A. (2013). International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Social network analysis in accounting information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.06.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.22371
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 2525 | views : 1741Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.