Intervensi melalui social media campaign dan panduan kantin sehat untuk meningkatkan perilaku makan sehat pada mahasiswa Departemen Teknik Mesin, Universitas Gadjah Mada

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.41720

Meia Audinah(1*), Ribia Tutstsintaiyn(2), Atiq Harkati(3), Zainab Zainab(4), Fahmi Baiquni(5), Yayi Suryo Prabandari(6)

(1) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(4) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(5) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(6) Departemen Perilaku Kesehatan, Lingkungan, dan Kedokteran Sosial, Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Fakultas Kedokteran, Kesehatan Masyarakat, dan Keperawatan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Social media campaign intervention program and healthy canteen kit is a strategy to increasing knowledge, attitudes, and modify the environment in order to achieve improved healthy eating behavior of students of the Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Mechanical Engineering Department. This study measured preeliminary outcomes from social media campaign interventions and the healthy canteen kit conducted in form of knowledge, attitudes, acceptance, and adoption of the program. This study used quasi experiment with quantitative and qualitative approach. First, quantitative research used pre-post test questionnaire (n = 52) to find out the changes in knowledge and attitudes of the social media campaign program. Second, qualitative research used semi-structured interview methods (n = 9) to determine the response and adoption of social media campaign programs and healthy canteen guidelines. The social media intervention campaign was conducted in May - August 2018 through official account Line and Instagram of KM DTM. Making process of a healthy canteen guide was a collaboration prepared together with the stakeholder in April - August 2018. The results on social media campaign programs presented a differences in mean of knowledge score of healthy eating before and after intervention with a significance level of 0.03 (p < 0.05) and there were significant differences in healthy eating attitudes before and after intervention ( p < 0.05) with an average difference of 1.0. Qualitatively, the dietary social media campaign showed good acceptance. Acceptance of healthy canteen guidelines was considered good and can be applied in the UGM Mechanical Engineering Department. Measuring the results of a healthy diet quantitatively and qualitatively showed positive results. The acceptance and adoption of healthy canteen guidelines is considered good and can be applied.


Keywords


social media campaign; healthy canteen kit; healthy eating knowledge; healthy eating attitude; college students

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1986.
  2. Holt M, Monk R, Powell S, Dooris M. Student perceptions of a healthy university. Public Health. 2015;129(6):674-83.
  3. Newton J, Dooris M, Wills J. Healthy universities: An example of a whole-system health-promoting setting. Glob Health Promot. 2016;23(June):57-65.
  4. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Peraturan Rektor Universitas Gadjah Mada Nomor 1/P/SK/HT/2015 tentang Kedudukan, Fungsi, dan Tugas Organisasi di Lingkungan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2015.
  5. Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Williams RL, Hutchesson MJ, Kennedy SG, Robards SL, et al. Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):45.
  6. Downes L. Physical activity and dietary habits of college students. J Nurse Pract. 2015;11(2):192-8.
  7. Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Health nutrition environment: Concept and measures. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19:330-3.
  8. Kim H, Xie B. Health literacy in the eHealth era: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling. 2017;100:1073-82.
  9. Welch V, Petkovic J, Pardo JP, Rader T, Tugwell P. Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: An overview of reviews. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016;36(4):63-75.
  10. Tobey LN, Manore MM. Social media and nutrition education: The food hero experience. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(2):128-33.
  11. Beaunoyer E, Arsenault M, Lomanowska AM, Guitton MJ. Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(2):183-9.
  12. Chung JE. Antismoking campaign videos on YouTube and audience response: Application of social media assessment metrics. Comput Human Behav. 2015;51(A):114-21.
  13. Scheppingen ARV, Vroome EMMD, Ten HKCJM, Bos EH, Zwetsloot GIJM, Mechelen WV. Inducing a health-promoting change process within an organization: The effectiveness of a large-scale intervention on social capital, openness, and autonomous motivation toward health. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56:1128-36.
  14. Villalonga-Olives EV, Wind TR, Kawachi I. Social capital interventions in public health: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2018;212:203-18.
  15. Laverack G. Health promotion practice: Building empowered communities. 1st ed. New York, USA: Open University Press; 2007.
  16. Jaime PC, Lock K. Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity. Prev Med. 2009;48(1):45-53.
  17. Dignan MB, Carr PA. Program planning for health education and promotion. 2nd ed. Pennsylvania, USA: Lea & Febiger; 1992.
  18. Yoong SL, Nathan NK, Wyse RJ, Preece SJ, Williams CM, Sutherland RL, et al. Assessment of the school nutrition environment: A study in Australian primary school canteens. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(2):215-22.
  19. Tam R, Yassa B, Parker H, O’Connor H, Allman-Farinelli M. University students’ on-campus food purchasing behaviors, preferences, and opinions on food availability, Nutrition. 2017;37:7-13.
  20. Schaubroeck T, Ceuppens S, Luong AD, Benetto E, Meester SD, Lachat C, et al. A pragmatic framework to score and inform about the environmental sustainability and nutritional profile of canteen meals, a case study on a university canteen. J Clean Prod. 2018;187:672-86.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.41720

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2599 | views : 3549

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.