* Corresponding Author
Era baru publikasi di Indonesia: status jurnal open access di Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.32920 Dasapta Erwin Irawan(1*), Juneman Abraham(2), Mochammad Tanzil Multazam(3), Cut Novianti Rachmi(4), Indrya Mulyaningsih(5), Sparisoma Viridi(6), Rino Rakhmata Mukti(7), Mitra Djamal(8), Deny Juanda Puradimaja(9)
(1) Fakultas Ilmu dan Teknologi Kebumian, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(2) Jurusan Psikologi, Universitas Bina Nusantara
(3) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
(4) Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran
(5) Prodi Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(6) Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(7) Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(8) Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(9) Fakultas Ilmu dan Teknologi Kebumian, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Introduction. The quality of journals in Indonesia is much criticized; however, the number of Indonesian journals that meet the criteria of Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ) is quite a lot. This study describes some facts of Indonesia’s publications based on DOAJ and World Bank data.
Data Collection Method. Some filtering processes in DOAJ database were done based on sum of journals, scientific fields distribution, and Article Processing Charge (APC). Open data regarding research funds among countries in World Bank database were analyzed.
Data Analysis. This study used quantitative-descriptive design with frequency analysis technique. Data visualization was done with R Statistical Computing and Google Sheets.
Results and Discussions. In March 2017, there were 500 Indonesian journals (5th rank worldwide); 420 of them were in Indonesian covering more than 51,000 articles (7th rank). The top three fields were: education, Islam religion, as well as business and commerce. As much as 70% of the journals were free of APC. Science must prioritize inclusiveness and equality inline with the principles of originality and honesty.
Conclusions. This study concludes that open access journals in Indonesia improves the accessibility, quality, and relevance of Indonesian research, which can be reused by communities, industries, and the government.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, J. (2018). Kebebasan akademik: Melanjutkan gagasan psikologi perguruan tinggi. INArxiv. Retrieved April 23, 2018, from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/q5nce/. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Q5NCE.
Abraham, J., & Wirayudha, M. S. (2015). Personality traits, sedentariness, and personal dilemma as the dynamic predictors of intention to use public transportation in greater Jakarta. Makara Hubs-Asia, 19(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v19i2.3481.
Bailey, C. W., Jr. (2006). What is open access? Digital Scholarship. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://digital-scholarship.org/cwb/WhatIsOA.htm.
Bhattacharya, A. (2017). Medical research: The shackles of scientific journals. The Economist. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21719480-and-how-cast-them-shackles-scientific-journals.
Butler, D. (2013). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://www.nature.com/news/investigating-journals-the-dark-side-of-publishing-1.12666.
Dardjowidjojo, S. (2007). Psikolinguistik: Memahami asas pemerolehan bahasa. Jakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mE-kj4TlJKMC&printsec=copyright&hl=id&source=gbs_pub_info_r.
Harnad, S. (2005). OA impact advantage = EA + (AA) + (QB) + QA + (CA) + UA. University of Southampton Institutional Repository. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262085/.
Harzing, A.-W. (2017). Google Scholar is a serious alternative to Web of Science. LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blog. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/03/16/google-scholar-is-a-serious-alternative-to-web-of-science/.
Irawan, D. E. (2015). WTF: Bagaimana Indonesia ditemukan? SEO for academics. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://dasaptaerwin.net/wp/2015/02/bagaimana-indonesia-ditemukan.html.
Irawan, D. E. (2017a). Open Science Indonesia datasets. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HXH78.
Irawan, D. E. (2017b). Mengorek jumlah makalah berbahasa Indonesia dalam basis data DOAJ dan hubungannya dengan parameter lainnya dari data Bank Dunia. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://derwinirawan.wordpress.com/2017/03/26/mengorek-jumlah-makalah-berbahasa-indonesia-dalam-basis-data-doaj-dan-bank-dunia/.
Irawan, D. E., Rachmi, C. N., Irawan, H., Abraham, J., Kusno, K., Multazam, M. T., …, Aziz, N. A. (2017). Penerapan open science di Indonesia agar riset lebih terbuka, mudah diakses, dan meningkatkan dampak saintifik. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 13(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.17054.
JISC. (2016). An introduction to open access. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/an-introduction-to-open-access.
Juneman, J. (2009). Aplikasi psikologi positif dalam dunia bisnis. Humanitas: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 6(2), 136–151. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from http://id.portalgaruda.org/?ref=browse&mod=viewarticle&article=124048.
Modi, H. (2014). Which indexing service is good from the following: Scopus, Thomson Reuters ISI, Google Scholar? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? ResearchGate. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_indexing_service_is_good_from_the_following_Scopus_Thomson_Reuters_ISI_Google_Scholar_What_are_the_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_each.
Nashihuddin, W., & Aulianto, D. R. (2016). Pengelolaan terbitan berkala ilmiah sesuai ketentuan akreditasi: Upaya menuju jurnal terakreditasi dan bereputasi internasional. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 15(1–2), 83–98. Retrieved from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/16921.
Rahim, R., Irawan, D.E., Zulfikar, A., Hardi, R., ArlimanS., L., Gultom, E.R, …, Abraham, J. (2018). INA-Rxiv: The missing puzzle in Indonesia’s scientific publishing workflow. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1007, 012032.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1007/1/012032.
Shearer, K., Yamaji, K., & Repanas, K. (2016). Asian open access meeting report. COAR. Retrieved April 17, 2017, from https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Open-Access-Asia-Report.pdf.
Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., …, Collister, L. B. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 1; referees: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 6(1151). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.1.
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 1; referees: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 5(632). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.1.
Tennant, J., & Matthias, L. (2017). How to make your research open access? For free and legally. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5285512.v2.
Tennant, J., & Mounce, R. (2015). Open research glossary (Version 1). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1482094.v1.
Viridi, S., & Yuliarto, B. (2017). Journal writing. In Sharing Session Kamil Pascasarjana ITB. http://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.12151.83366.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.32920
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 15577
| 
views : 13221
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.