_logo2.png){kind=logo}
* Corresponding Author
Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan, Sosial dan Tata Kelola terhadap Kinerja Pasar dengan Kontroversi ESG sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi
https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v11i2.84771 Rizqi Amalia(1*), Indra Wijaya Kusuma(2)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(2) Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Permasalahan seperti krisis ekonomi, pemanasan global, gagasan keberlanjutan dan tata kelola telah mengalami pertumbuhan dan peningkatan yang kuat di dalam industri. Indeks ESG (environmental, social, governance) telah menarik perhatian para investor untuk praktik investasi berkelanjutan dan mengukur kinerja laporan berkelanjutan perusahaan. Penelitian ini menguji hubungan antara kinerja lingkungan, sosial dan tata kelola terhadap kinerja pasar yang diukur menggunakan rasio Tobin’s Q. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga memeriksa lebih lanjut tentang keterlibatan skor kontroversi ESG sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian in adalah seluruh perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia dan memiliki data ESG pada Thomson Reuters Database. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode purposive sampling dan diperoleh sampel akhir penelitian sebanyak 159 perusahaan selama lima tahun periode pengamatan dari tahun 2016 hingga 2020. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kinerja ESG berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pasar. Selain itu, tidak terdapat pengaruh moderasi dari kontroversi ESG terhadap hubungan antara kinerja lingkungan sosial, dan tata kelola terhadap kinerja pasar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678 Al Faruq, N., Syukra, R., & Nuky, E. (2021). 144 Emiten Sudah Implementasikan ESG. Investor.Id. https://investor.id/market-and-corporate/262737/144-emiten-sudah-implementasikan-esg Almeyda, R., & Darmansyah, A. (2019). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Financial Performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 5, 278–290. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340 Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8 Buallay, A. (2020). Sustainability Reporting and Firm’s Performance: Comparative Study Between Manufacturing and Banking Sectors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371 Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1103-7 Crifo, P., & Mottis, N. (2013). Socially Responsible Investment in France. Business and Society, 55(4), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313500216 DasGupta, R. (2021). Financial Performance Shortfall, ESG Controversies, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Firms around the World. Finance Research Letters, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487 Deegan, C. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG Performance and Firm Value: The moderating Role of Disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 Fatima, A. H. A., Abdullah, N., & Sulaiman, M. (2015). Environmental disclosure quality: Examining the impact of the stock exchange of Malaysia’s listing requirements. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2014-0041 Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. (2017). Sensitive Industries Produce Better ESG Performance: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180 Gatzert, N., Schmit, J. T., & Kolb, A. (2015). Assessing the Risks of Insuring Reputation Risk. The Journal of Risk and Insuranc, 83(3), 641–679. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43998279 Li, J., Haider, Z. A., Jin, X., & Yuan, W. (2018). Corporate Controversy, Social Responsibility and Market Performance: International Evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.013 Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on Firm Value: The Role of CEO Power. British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007 Melinda, A., & Wardhani, R. (2020). The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance, and Controversies on Firms’ Value: Evidence from Asia. Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics), 27, 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1571-038620200000027011 Natalia, M., Gunawan, Y., & Carolina, V. (2016). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Pasar dengan Moderasi Efektivitas Dewan Komisaris dan Independensi Dewan Komisaris. Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(1), 45–64. Nguyen, P., & Nguyen, A. (2015). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Risk. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2013-0093 Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate Controversies and Company’s Financial Performance: Exploring the Moderating Role of ESG Practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341 Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 Tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik., (2017). Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2 Refinitiv Eikon Datastream. (2020). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores from Refinitiv. https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/e%0An_us/documents/methodology/esg-scores-methodology.pdf. Shakil, M. H. (2020). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Stock Price Volatility: A Moderating Role of Firm Size. Journal of Public Affairs, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2574 Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Financial Risk: Moderating Role of ESG Controversies and Board Gender Diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144 Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. www.jstor.org/stable/258788 Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029 Walsh, G., Mitchell, V. W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Reputation: A Customer Perspective. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00557.x Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v11i2.84771
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 9470
| 
views : 20903
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2302 - 1500