EVALUASI PERGERAKAN EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES TO BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION (Studi Kasus Universitas Terbuka)

https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v6i3.59090

Tary Pranoura Harsha(1*), Sumiyana Sumiyana(2)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(2) Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi reason logic business transformationbelum diterapkan di Universitas Terbuka dan mengevaluasi pergerakan emergingopportunitiess to business strategic IT pada Universitas Terbuka. Penelitian iniadalah penelitian kualitatif dengan studi kasus menggunakan 6 informan denganmetode purposive sampling. Teori yang digunakan adalah goal setting theory denganmelihat dari dua dimensi. Dua dimensi itu antara lain partisipasi anggaran dan modalpsikologi. Partisipasi anggaran yang dilihat adalah bagaimana karyawan diUniversitas Terbuka terlibat dalam rapat anggaran yang diselenggaran setiap tahunsatu kali. Sedangkan modal psikologi yang dilihat adalah bagaimana motivasi,optimis, harapan, ketahanan, dan komitmen organisasi tercipta dalam diri karyawanserta pejabat UT untuk tercapainya tujuan organisasi. Hasil penelitian inimenunjukkan bahwa Universitas Terbuka belum menerapkan disrupted innovativesehingga sistem perkuliahan masih belum dinamis, dan sumber daya manusia yangbelum memadai sehingga Universitas Terbuka belum dapat mencapai ke tahapbusiness transformation. Disrupted innovative adalah inovasi yang menggantikanaktivitas-aktivitas lama atau teknologi lama dengan yang baru

Keywords


Abis, Abisugm, Maksi,Maksiygm, Feb, FebUgm, goal setting theory, disrupted innovative, strategic IT

Full Text:

PDF


References

Applegate, Lynda M. 2009. CorporateInformation Strategy AndManagement. Eight Edition. NewYork: The Mc-Graw-HillCompanies.Ayuningtyas. 2013. PerencanaanStrategis Untuk OrganisasiPelayanan Kesehatan. Edisi I.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.Baatartogtokh, Baljir., King AndrewA. 2015. How Useful Is Theoryof Disruptive Innovation. MITSloan, Management Review.Vol.57, No.1.Brownell, P., & Morris Mc Innes.1986. Budgetary Participation,Motivation, and Performance.The Accounting Review, Vol.61,No.4, October 1986 page 587-600.Christensen, Clayton, M. 1998.Disruptive Technologies: ACredible Threat to LeadingPrograms in ContinuiningMedical Education. The Journalof Continuing Education InHealth Professions, Vol.18, pp.69-80.Croteu, Anne Marie., Bergeron,Francois. 2001. An InformationTechnology Trology: BusinessStrategy, TechnologicalDeployment and OrganizationalPerformance. Journal ofStrategic Information Systems 1077-99.Gottschalk, P. The changing roles ofIT Leaders. 2001. StrategicInformation Technology:Opportunities for CompetitiveAdvantage. Idea GroupPublishing.Jogiyanto, Hartono M, 2005. SistemInformasi Strategik.Yogyakarta. Penerbit: ANDIYogyakarta. Edisi Kedua.Khabib, M. et al. 2013. Informationand Communication Technology.In International Conference,ICT-EurAsia. Yogyakarta:Springer Science and BusinessMedia.Keyes, J. 2005. Implementing The ITBalanced Scorecard First Edit.London: Auerbach Publications.Locke, E. A. 1968. Toward A TheoryOf Task Motivation AndIncentives. OrganizationalBehavior and HumanPerformance, 3, 157-189.Luftman, Jerry. 2005. Key Issues forIT Executives 2004. MISQuartely Executive Vol.4 No.2.Luthans, Fred. dkk. 2007.Psychological Capital:Developing The HumanCompetitive Edge. New York:Oxford University Press.Luthans, Fred. Dkk. 2007. PositivePsychological Capital:Measurement and Relationshipwith Performance andSatisfaction. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior. vol 60, pp. 541–572. BlackwellPublishing.Moleong, Lexy J. 2012. MetodologiPenelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. EdisiRevisi.Nurcahyani. 2010. PengaruhPartisipasi Anggaran TerhadapKinerja Manajerial MelaluiKomitmen Organisasi DanPersepsi Inovasi SebagaiVariabel Intervening. FakultasEkonomi UniversitasDiponegoro.Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46. 2011.Penilaian Prestasi Kerja PegawaiNegeri Sipil. Jakarta.Riege, Andreas M. 2003. Validity andReliability Test in Case StudyResearch: A Literature Reviewwith hands-on Applications forEach Research Phase.Qualitative Market Research: AnInternational Journal 6 (2):75-86.Robbins, Stephen P. 2002. PerilakuOrganisasi : Konsep–Kontroversi–Aplikasi, Jakarta:Prehallindo.Rogers, Everett, M. 1979. Diffusion OfInnovations. Third Edition.Stanford, California.Smith, dkk., 2007. DevelopingInformation Technology Strategyfor Business Value. Journal ofInformation TechnologyManagement ISSN #1042-1319.Snyder, C.R., Shorey, H.S., Cheavens,J., Pulvers, K.M., Adams III,V.H., & Wiklund, C. 2002. Hopeand Academic Success inCollege. Journal of EducationalPsychology 4, 820-826.Soleha, N, Galih, & Tansil, L. 2013.The Effect Of BudgetaryParticipation On JobPerformance With PsychologicalCapital And OrganizationalCommitment As An InterveningVariable (Empirical Study OnDinas Pendapatan DanPengelolaan Keuangan DaerahDistricts Of Lebak). ProsidingSimposium Nasional AkuntansiXVI – Manado.Venkatraman, N., Henderson, John C.1998. Real Strategies for VirtualOrganizing. Sloan ManagementReview Fall 1998.Ward, J., Peppard, J. 2002. Strategicplanning for InformationSystems. Third Edition. England:John Willey & Sons, Ltd, WestSussex.Yin, R.. 2012. Studi Kasus Desain danMetode 11 th., Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.Yu, Dan and Hang, Chang Chieh.2010. A Reflective Review ofDisruptive Innovation Theory.International Journal ofManagement Reviews, Vol. 12,435–452



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v6i3.59090

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 507 | views : 591

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

 

 Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

2302 - 1500